Charles Rocchio v. Eagle Mission, Inc., Joel M. Pressman

Good Law
988 F.2d 121·1993 WL 51193·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10676
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 199391-56111California1,817 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles ROCCHIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EAGLE MISSION, INC., Defendant, Joel M. Pressman, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-56111. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. Decided Feb. 26, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, No. CV-88-0329-H; Earl B. Gilliam, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before BEEZER, BRUNETTI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Charles Rocchio appeals the dismissal of his suit with prejudice against Joel Pressman. He asserts that the district court erred in holding Pressman is not liable for federal securities violations under §§ 12(1) and 12(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 771(1) and (2)) and under § 10b of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78j(b)) and Rule 10b-5 ( 17 C.F.R. § 240 .10b-5). He also claims the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.