George F. Semeil v. Michael O'COnnOr

Good Law
988 F.2d 121·1993 WL 57683·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10680
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 199391-55064California1,243 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. George F. SEMEIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael O'CONNOR; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55064. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 4, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CV-89-1227-RB, Robert C. Bonner, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. DISMISSED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 George F. Semeil appeals pro se the district court's order granting defendants' motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to serve process within 120 days of filing the complaint or, in the alternative, for failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We dismiss in part and affirm in part. 3 Semeil brought this section 1983 action seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages against several…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.