Michael Percival Patricia Shors Mary Brennan Jeani Prior Peter Percival v. Lydia Ann Percival

988 F.2d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael PERCIVAL; Patricia Shors; Mary Brennan; Jeani Prior; Peter Percival, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lydia Ann PERCIVAL, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-56152. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. * Decided Feb. 12, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, No. CV-90-1558-GT; Gordon Thompson, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. 2 S.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before HUG and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and SEDWICK, ** District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM *** 6 Appellants, the adult children of Wright C. Percival ("Wright"), challenge the district court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of Wright's surviving spouse, Lydia Ann Percival ("Lydia"). Specifically, appellants assert that the district court erred in applying the standard for undue influence articulated in Estate of Mann, 229 Cal.Rptr. 225, 231 (Cal.Ct.App.1986); Estate of Nelson,…