United States of America, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee v. L.R. Bretz, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant

988 F.2d 122 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee v. L.R. BRETZ, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant. No. 91-35894. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1992. Decided March 12, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, No. CV-84-00050-JFB; James F. Battin, District Judge, Presiding. 2 D.Mont. [APPEAL AFTER REMAND FROM 902 F.2D 41]. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and CALLISTER, ** Senior District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM ** 6 L.R. Bretz appeals a district court grant of summary judgment in his action to foreclose on a mechanic's lien. We affirm. FACTS 7 The mechanic's lien now held by Bretz was filed in 1978. Soon afterwards, the Small Business Administration ("SBA") guaranteed a bank loan secured by a mortgage against the real property encumbered by the lien. The SBA…