Donald Ray Turner v. Jonathon Bishop

Good Law
988 F.2d 122·1993 WL 43912·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10751
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 199392-35458California349 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 122 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald Ray TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jonathon BISHOP, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-35458. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 18, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; No. CV-92-462-CRD (PKS), Carolyn R. Dimmick, District Judge, Presiding. W.D.Wash. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donald R. Turner appeals pro se the district court's order denying his motion for appointment of counsel in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b). See Ivey v. Board. of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 269 (9th Cir.1982) (the trial court' refusal to appoint counsel in civil rights cases is an appealable interlocutory order). 3 Turner's complaint alleged the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.