Sandor Szemerey v. Donna E. Shalala Secretary

988 F.2d 122 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sandor SZEMEREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA ** Secretary, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-56112. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1993. * Decided March 11, 1993. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; No. CV-90-1384-H, Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before HUG, SKOPIL and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Sandor Szemerey appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment affirming the Secretary's decision denying him social security disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Szemerey contends on appeal that the Secretary erred in determining that he does not suffer from disabling impairments. We reject that contention and we affirm. DISCUSSION 3 The Secretary is directed to employ a five-step sequential process for determining whether a claimant is…