United States v. Ricardo Berumen-Blanco

988 F.2d 122 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo BERUMEN-BLANCO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30015. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 6, 1993. * Decided March 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. CR91-1046T; Jack E. Tanner, District Judge, Presiding. W.D.Wash. CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED AND REMANDED. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, FARRIS and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Ricardo Berumen-Blanco was convicted by a jury of illegal reentry into the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . The district court sentenced him to 33 months of imprisonment and 3 years of supervised release, to run consecutive to the state sentence Berumen-Blanco was already serving. Berumen-Blanco appeals, arguing the district court erred in: (1) admitting a certification of…