James B. Turner, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Metro, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee

Good Law
988 F.2d 122·1993 WL 51267·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10757
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 199392-36637California775 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 122 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James B. TURNER, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant, v. METRO, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellee. No. 92-36637. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided Feb. 25, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. CV-91-01322-BJR; Barbara J. Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding. W.D.Wash. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James B. Turner appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration following the dismissal of his complaint against the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro). Turner alleged employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , and the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.