Leif D. Soderling Jay S. Soderling v. Joseph H. Crabtree, Warden, F.C.I., Sheridan

988 F.2d 122 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leif D. SODERLING; Jay S. Soderling, Petitioners-Appellants, v. Joseph H. CRABTREE, Warden, F.C.I., Sheridan, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-35609. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 4, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; No. CV-91-1349-REJ-(GEJ), Robert C. Jones, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leif and Jay Soderling, federal prisoners, appeal pro se the district court's denial of their 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging the Parole Commission's (Commission's) decision to change their parole dates. The Soderlings contend that the Commission erred by reopening their parole determinations under 28 C.F.R. § 2.28 (f) based on "new and significant adverse information" because the information in question was not…