United States v. Marceline Brock

988 F.2d 122 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marceline BROCK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10374. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 5, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii; No. CR-91-00639-01-DA, David A. Ezra, District Judge, Presiding. D.Hawaii AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marceline Brock appeals her conviction, following a jury trial, for four counts of income tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 . Brock contends that the evidence was insufficient to prove that her failure to file tax returns was willful. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 Sufficient evidence to support a conviction exists if "a reasonable jury, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, could have found the defendant…