Standard Chartered Bank v. U.S. Fidelity and Guar. Co.

988 F.2d 122 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK, a United Kingdom corporation; Standard Chartered Overseas Holdings Limited, a United Kingdom corporation; United Bancorp of Arizona, a Delaware corporation; and United Bank of Arizona, an Arizona chartered bank, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16558. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. Decided Feb. 23, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CV-89-00039-RGS; Roger G. Strand, District Judge, Presiding. 2 D.Ariz. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before ALARCON, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges 5 MEMORANDUM * 6 Standard Chartered Bank and affiliated entities appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF & G) in this action for coverage on a fidelity bond. Standard Chartered…