United States v. Danford M. Bickmore

988 F.2d 122 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danford M. BICKMORE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10119, 92-10120. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1992. Decided March 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Nos. CR 90-0220-WHO, CR 90-0507-WHO; William N. Orrick, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM * Appellant Danford M. Bickmore plead guilty to counts of mail fraud, wire fraud, making counterfeit bonds, and making false statements on federal bonds. He was sentenced to 46 months imprisonment, and ordered to pay fines and substantial restitution. Bickmore appeals his sentence, arguing the district court erred in: (1) imposing an enhancement for obstruction of justice; (2) including losses not attributable to a federal offense as…