Jerry Stewart v. William Gotcher, Warden

Good Law
988 F.2d 122·1993 WL 47212·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10754
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 199392-16095California552 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 122 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerry STEWART, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William GOTCHER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-16095. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 24, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CV-92-00565-SMM, Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerry Stewart, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. Stewart was convicted of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. We review the denial of a petition for habeas corpus de novo, and the denial of a motion for reconsideration for an abuse of discretion. Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989) (habeas corpus); Morton by Morton v. Safeco…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.