United States v. Jeff William Darden

988 F.2d 123 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeff William DARDEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30197. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 18, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; No. CR-92-2-HJF, Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jeff William Darden appeals his conviction, following the entry of a conditional guilty plea, for making a false statement to the government in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 . Darden argues that the district court erred by refusing to recuse the entire United States Attorney's office for the District of Oregon ("U.S. Attorney's office") because of an alleged conflict of interest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review for abuse of discretion the district court's…