United States v. Javier Gutierrez Garcia

988 F.2d 123 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier GUTIERREZ GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50451. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 5, 1993. * Decided March 9, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; No. CR-91-0593-01-JSR, John S. Rhoades, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, HUG and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gutierrez-Garcia had a right to testify at his suppression hearing free from the risk that his testimony would be used as evidence against him at trial. Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 392-93 (1968). But he had no right to testify free from the risk that he'd be punished for testifying falsely. United States v. Kahan, 415 U.S. 239, 243 (1974) (per curiam); see also United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 126-27 (1980) ("perjury prosecutions are permissible…