United States v. David Estrada, AKA Frederico Martinez MacIas

988 F.2d 123 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David ESTRADA, aka Frederico Martinez Macias, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50727. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 5, 1993. Decided March 12, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-91-0417-DT-1; Dickran M. Tevrizian, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before D.W. NELSON, WIGGINS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Defendant David Estrada was charged with two counts of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a)(d). A jury convicted Estrada on both counts. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. FACTS 3 On April 8, 1991, at approximately 1:30 p.m., Estrada approached teller Mary Ellen…