United States v. Peggy Jean Delay, United States of America v. Paul Joseph Delay

988 F.2d 123 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peggy Jean deLAY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul Joseph deLAY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-30090, 92-30091. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 5, 1993. * Decided March 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, No. CR-90-10-2-HJF; Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or. AFFIRMED. Before TANG, POOLE and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated cases, Paul Joseph deLay and Peggy Jean deLay ("deLays") entered conditional pleas and were convicted for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. Pursuant to their conditional pleas, the deLays now appeal their convictions arguing that the district court erred in denying their motion to suppress…