United States v. George Gaydos

988 F.2d 123 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George GAYDOS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10209. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth, Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 18, 1992. Decided March 11, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. CR-88-20011, David A. Ezra, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. MEMORANDUM * Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 George Gaydos appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). We affirm. I. Facts 2 In the course of their investigation of appellant Gaydos' alleged cocaine and methamphetamine processing and distribution activity, DEA agents and informants purchased cocaine on two separate occasions in 1987. In January 1988, a confidential informant began…