United States v. Samuel Guevara

988 F.2d 123 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel GUEVARA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50255. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 5, 1993. Decided Feb. 23, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-90-981-SVW; Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before BEEZER, BRUNETTI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Samuel Guevara pleaded guilty to one count of unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a), and now challenges the determination of his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines. Specifically, Guevara alleges that the district court's reliance on the charging documents in determining that his second-degree burglaries were crimes of violence was inappropriate. The district court concluded that Guevara is a career offender since his seven prior…