United States v. Joaquin Giraldo, Aka, Wilson Munoz, Guillermo

Good Law
988 F.2d 123·1993 WL 64857·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10802
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 199391-50232California276 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 123 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joaquin GIRALDO, aka, Wilson Munoz, Guillermo, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50232. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 2, 1993. * Decided March 9, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-90-0790-JGD, John G. Davies, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, HUG and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Giraldo argues the government failed to comply with the parental notice requirements of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act (FJDA). 18 U.S.C. §§ 5031 , 5032. After five hearings held over the course of two months, the district court found that Giraldo was an adult at the time of the offense. Giraldo does not challenge this finding on appeal. Because Giraldo was an adult, the notice requirements of the FJDA do not apply to him. 3 We note…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.