United States v. Edwin Quintana Garcia

988 F.2d 123 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwin Quintana GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-50356. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 10, 1992. * Decided Feb. 23, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-89-919-Kn; David V. Kenyon, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, SCHROEDER and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Garcia presents two arguments on appeal. He contends that (1) the affidavit supporting the warrant to search his apartment relied on stale information, and that (2) the district court judge should have compelled the government to disclose the identity of the confidential informant ("CI") who supplied the aforementioned information to federal agents. Because the "stale" information was only seven days old, and Garcia's notion that the CI "might" testify a…