United States v. William L. Fisher

Good Law
988 F.2d 123·1993 WL 51269·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10781
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 199392-30313California342 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 123 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William L. FISHER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30313. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided Feb. 25, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, No. CR-92-81-03-JKS; James K. Singleton, District Judge, Presiding. D.Alaska VACATED AND REMANDED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Fisher appeals the 27-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to maintaining a place for cocaine base use and distribution in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856 (a)(1). Fisher contends that the district court erred by granting only a one-level reduction in his offense level for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand. 3 We review de novo a district court's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.