United States v. Ronald Crutchfield
Opinion
Opinion
988 F.2d 123 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald CRUTCHFIELD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50631. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 9, 1992. Decided March 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-90-0497-KN-07; David V. Kenyon, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before FLETCHER, O'SCANNLAIN and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Ronald Crutchfield was convicted of manufacturing PCP in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). The district court sentenced him to a term of imprisonment of twenty-five years and levied a $4 million fine. He contends that the fine was imposed in an improper manner. We disagree, and affirm. 3 I. Facts. 4 Crutchfield was a mid-level member of the Johnson narcotics distribution organization, according to the presentence report. His primary function was to cook and…