United States v. Norma Haros

988 F.2d 123 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norma HAROS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50135. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 10, 1992. Decided Feb. 11, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, No. CR-91-582-01-GT; Gordon Thompson, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, SCHROEDER and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Norma Haros was convicted of conspiracy to possess cocaine with an intent to distribute and possession of cocaine. Appellant challenges her conviction on two grounds: (1) there was insufficient evidence on which to convict; and (2) the district court abused its discretion when it failed to substitute counsel at Appellant's request. 3 The appropriate standard to determine whether there was sufficient evidence to convict Appellant is whether "any…