United States v. Brandon Morrison, Clarence Morrison

988 F.2d 124 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brandon MORRISON, Clarence Morrison, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 92-10121, 92-10122. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 17, 1992. Decided March 5, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CR-90-373-PHX-RGS, Roger G. Strand, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Clarence and Brandon Morrison appeal their convictions upon conditional guilty pleas to two counts of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). They contend that the district court erred by denying them a "Franks hearing" to determine whether the search warrant affidavit was materially flawed for purposes of their motion to suppress, and that the affidavit underlying the search…