United States v. William Michael Neyland

988 F.2d 124 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Michael NEYLAND, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30018. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 1, 1993. * Decided March 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, No. CR-90-335-RE; James A. Redden, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or. AFFIRMED. Before TANG, POOLE and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Michael Neyland appeals his jury conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g). Neyland contends the district court erred by denying a motion to suppress evidence and by enhancing Neyland's sentence based on three prior "violent felony" convictions pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e). We affirm. I. 3 Neyland does not dispute the district court's finding that "Officer Curl saw what appeared to be a sawed-off rifle or shotgun…