United States v. Edward Anthony Kaletka

988 F.2d 124 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Anthony KALETKA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30020. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1993. Decided Feb. 11, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, No. CR-90-328-HJF; Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or. AFFIRMED. Before D.W. NELSON, TROTT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Edward Anthony Kaletka pleaded guilty to the crime of unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) (1988). The plea agreement was made pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2) which permits the defendant to enter a conditional plea of guilty, reserving in writing the right, on appeal from the judgment, to review of the adverse determination of any specified pretrial motion. Kaletka now appeals the district court's rulings on (1) his pretrial motion to suppress the…