United States v. William Mitchell Nowlin, Daniel Aloysius Jones, William Dee Morris, and Robert Wells

988 F.2d 124 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Mitchell NOWLIN, Daniel Aloysius Jones, William Dee Morris, and Robert Wells, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 91-30429, 91-30446, 91-30460, and 91-30468. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1993. Decided March 1, 1993. As Amending on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc April 16, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Nos. CR-90-20-H-CCL, CR-90-5-BU-CCL; Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding. D.Mont. AFFIRMED. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, FARRIS and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Codefendants Daniel Jones and William Nowlin appeal the district court's denial of their motion to dismiss on grounds of double joepardy and collateral estoppel. Codefendants William Morris and Robert Wells appeal their jury trial convictions for conspiracy to defraud the United States…