United States v. Frank Lockett

988 F.2d 124 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank LOCKETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30002. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 1, 1993. * Decided March 4, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; No. CR-91-00056-HJF, Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or. AFFIRMED. Before TANG, POOLE and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frank Renard Lockett appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Lockett argues that his conviction should be reversed because the district court failed to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a defective search warrant. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Lockett contends that the district court improperly denied his motion to suppress evidence, including five ounces of cocaine and a pager, seized from…