United States v. Peter Nchu

988 F.2d 124 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter NCHU, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10439. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided Feb. 25, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, No. CR-92-00089-LDG; Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding. D.Nev. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Peter Nchu appeals from his 21-month sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines following his guilty plea to unauthorized use of a credit card in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a)(2). Nchu contends that the district court erred by adjusting his offense level upward for obstruction of justice pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 because he gave a false name and place of birth to the probation officer preparing his presentence report (PSR). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and…