United States v. Durran Wynn Jack

988 F.2d 124 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Durran Wynn JACK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50400. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 23, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-90-0901-JGD; John G. Davies, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Durran Jack appeals from his conviction, following a jury trial, for robbery of a savings and loan in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Jack contends that the district court erred by denying his post-verdict motion for acquittal based on insufficiency of the evidence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(c). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. A. Facts 3 At approximately 2:55 p.m. on November 5, 1990, a robber entered the Downey Savings and Loan in Norwalk, California.…