United States v. Alexander Ifeanyi Ijemba

988 F.2d 124 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander Ifeanyi IJEMBA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50400. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 5, 1993. * Decided March 5, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-90-0872-WDK-3, William D. Keller, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before CANBY, BOOCHEVER and WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alexander Ifeanyi Ijemba was convicted of various counts relating to a conspiracy to import heroin for distribution. He appeals the convictions and sentence on various grounds. We affirm. 3 * Ijemba contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of the conspiracy charges. Since no motion for acquittal was made at the close of evidence, we review the sufficiency of evidence for plain error. United States v. Mora, 876 F.2d 76, 77 (9th Cir.1989). Here,…