United States v. Manuel Moll

988 F.2d 124 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel MOLL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50341. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1992. * Decided Feb. 17, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-91-763-CBM, Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before CHOY, SNEED and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Defendant Martin Moll pled guilty to three counts of a twenty-one count First Superseding Indictment charging him with embezzlement of bank funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 656 and with conspiracy to embezzle in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 . Prior to pleading guilty, Moll made a Motion to Dismiss the indictment. Moll argued that the indictment failed to allege a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 656 . Moll admitted that he had removed cancelled travelers checks from the bank but…