United States v. Norman W. Olsen

988 F.2d 124 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norman W. OLSEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-35513. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 5, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; Nos. CR-89-29-WLD, CV-92-404-WLD, William L. Dwyer, District Judge, Presiding. W.D.Wash. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Norman W. Olsen, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order denying his request for transcripts of his criminal trial. Olsen contends that he was entitled to transcripts even though he had yet not filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 28 U.S.C. § 753 (f) provides as follows: 3 Fees for transcripts furnished in proceedings brought under section 2255 of this…