United States v. Robert Barry Jordan

988 F.2d 124 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Barry JORDAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30001. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, No. CR-90-28-01-HJF; Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Barry Jordan appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion for the return of cash, a wallet containing identification, and two airline tickets seized during the execution of a search warrant at his property in Sheridan, Oregon. Jordan contends that the seized property was not related to any illegal activity and that the district court erred by (1) failing to allow him to contest the validity of the proceeding by which some of the property was administratively…