United States v. Alberto Lizerazo-Villegas

988 F.2d 124 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto LIZERAZO-VILLEGAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50455. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 24, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-91-0057-AHS, Alicemarie H. Stotler, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, CANBY and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alberto Lizerazo-Villegas appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines, imposed following his conviction by guilty plea to attempted money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(1). Lizerazo-Villegas contends that he was entitled to a downward adjustment in his base offense level for his role as a minimal or minor participant in the offense. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 A defendant waives his right to challenge…