United States v. William Roger Reaves

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Roger REAVES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50434. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-82-0719-TJH-1; Terry J. Hatter, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Roger Reaves appeals from his sentence following revocation of probation. He contends the district court lacked jurisdiction to sentence him because the term of probation had expired prior to the application for and filing of the bench warrant for probation violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm because the probationary term had not expired when the revocation action was taken. 3 We review de novo the district court's assumption…