United States v. Steven K. Swinburne

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven K. SWINBURNE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-10492. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 9, 1993. * Decided March 11, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CR-88-00330-RMB, Richard M. Bilby, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, NOONAN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Steven Swinburne appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained through the use of a judicially-approved wiretap and two subsequent extensions of the wiretap. Appellant pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and cocaine, while reserving the right to appeal the district court's order denying the motion to suppress. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2). We affirm. 3 To obtain a wiretap, an application must include a "full and complete…