United States v. Matthias Pollard

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthias POLLARD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-10566. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 18, 1992. Decided March 3, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; No. CR-S-89-163-RAR, Raul A. Ramirez, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Defendant Matthias Pollard appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress. Pollard argues that evidence presented at trial was unlawfully obtained through two searches of his motel room. He is correct; we reverse and remand. 3 * On March 30, 1989, the Sacramento Police Detective Clark received an anonymous tip that a person in Room 202 of the All Star Inn in Sacramento, California appeared to have a sawed-off shotgun. Approximately…