United States v. Antonio Santiago-Lopez, AKA Antonio Tonio Santiago-Martinez

Good Law
988 F.2d 125·1993 WL 33861·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10947
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 199392-50064California632 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio SANTIAGO-LOPEZ, aka Antonio Tonio Santiago-Martinez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50064. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 11, 1992. Decided Feb. 11, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-91-0857-WDK; William D. Keller, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, SCHROEDER and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Antonio Santiago-Lopez appeals his sentence imposed after pleading guilty to transferring false documents and possession with intent to transfer false documents. The basis for this appeal is the following: (1) the district court judge should have been recused because of demonstrated bias; (2) the district court erred twice by departing from the Sentencing Guidelines; and (3) even if proper, the departure was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.