United States v. Anthony Paul Rowe

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Paul ROWE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10127. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 11, 1993. Decided Feb. 19, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; No. CR-89-20138-JTN, John T. Noonan, Circuit Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. REVERSED AND REMANDED. 1 Before GOODWIN and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and HUFF, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Appellant Paul Rowe ("Rowe") pleaded guilty to conspiracy and misapplication of savings and loan funds. In addition to imposing a prison sentence, the district court ordered Rowe to make restitution under the Victim and Witness Protection Act ("VWPA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3663 , to the Resolution Trust Corporation in the amount of $500,000. We reverse the restitutionary order and remand for resentencing. 4 * During 1983 and 1984, Rowe, in his…