United States v. Salvador Suazo-Sosa

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Salvador SUAZO-SOSA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50121. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1993. * Decided Feb. 23, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, No. CR-91-310-12-AM; Alfredo C. Marquez, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before BEEZER, BRUNETTI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 On August 21, 1991, a jury convicted appellant Salvador Suazo-Sosa of two counts of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846; and one count of possession of a listed precursor chemical, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (d)(1), 802(33), 802(34)(C) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Suazo-Sosa was represented by counsel at trial. Subsequently, Suazo-Sosa substituted new…