United States v. Robert G. Sand

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert G. SAND, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10103. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided Feb. 26, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CR-90-00060-WBS; William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert G. Sand appeals his conviction, following his plea of guilty to conspiracy to import and distribute in excess of one kilogram of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963 . Sand claims, first, that his guilty plea did not constitute a waiver of his rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause and, second, that double jeopardy concerns require reversal of his conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 A defendant's plea of guilty does not waive…