United States v. Andrew Arenas Romero

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew Arenas ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10293. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided Feb. 25, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CR-91-00517-01-JM; John M. Roll, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Andrew Arenas Romero appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for failing to report exporting currency in excess of $10,000 in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5316 . Romero contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Romero also contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to move to suppress the evidence seized pursuant to a border patrol stop. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3…