United States v. Angel Quintana

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel QUINTANA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50391. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided Feb. 26, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, No. CR-91-825-01-JHK; Judith N. Keep, Chief Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Esther B. Gaxiola, a cosignatory on the bond of Angel Quintana, her son, appeals the district court's denial of her motion to remit the bond in whole or in part pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 46(e). Quintana is a fugitive, purportedly in Mexico. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review for an abuse of discretion the district court's decision not to remit a bond in whole or in part. United States v. Minor, 846 F.2d 1184, 1190 (9th Cir.1988). Moreover, the…