United States v. Leland Sagaser

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leland SAGASER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-35340. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1992. * Decided Feb. 18, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; No. CV-91-5510-RJB, Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding. W.D.Wash. AFFIRMED. Before CHOY, SNEED and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leland Sagaser appeals pro se from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate sentence on the grounds that his guilty plea was involuntary and he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Sagaser claims that he was induced to plead guilty by his attorney's promise that he would receive a sentence of at most 27 months imprisonment, a sentence considerably shorter than what he eventually received. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and we affirm. 3 In May of…