United States v. George Wayne Rowen

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Wayne ROWEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10588. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 23, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CR-90-00470-RCB; Robert C. Broomfield, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 George Rowen appeals from his sentence, imposed following a guilty plea, for using and carrying firearms during and in relation to a drug crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). Rowen contends that the district court erred by imposing a fine as part of his sentence, imposing restrictions on his right to association as a condition of his supervised release, and failing to recommend that he be confined in a prison facility near his family. The United States contends that Rowen has…