United States v. Francisco Pozo-Aparicio, AKA Francisco Pozo Aparicio

Good Law
988 F.2d 125·1993 WL 45303·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10959
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 199391-50867California617 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco POZO-APARICIO, aka Francisco Pozo Aparicio, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50867. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 1, 1993. * Decided Feb. 23, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-91-0669-HLH; Harry L. Hupp, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before BEEZER, BRUNETTI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Francisco Pozo-Aparicio pleaded guilty to one count of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) (1988). He had delivered 34.5 kilograms of cocaine to an undercover agent. The district court imposed a 151-month sentence. Pozo-Aparicio appeals his sentence. He contends he was entitled to downward adjustments in his sentence for acceptance of responsibility and for minor or minimal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.