United States v. Ernie R. Sanders

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernie R. SANDERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50705. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1993. Decided Feb. 18, 1993. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing May 17, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; No. CR-89-0817-CCN-01, Clarence C. Newcomer, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and SNEED and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Sanders appeals from his conviction following a jury trial for conspiracy to possess marijuana, possession of marijuana, possession of 78 marijuana plants, and possession of hashish, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). He also appeals from his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines). The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have…