United States v. Sergio Peral-Cota, United States of America v. Moises Barraza-Armenta

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio PERAL-COTA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Moises BARRAZA-ARMENTA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-50102, 91-50136. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth, Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 5, 1992. Decided March 11, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR 90-783 R, Manuel L. Real, Chief Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before HUG, FLETCHER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants Sergio Peral-Cota and Moises Barraza-Armenta appeal their convictions for smuggling illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(1)(B), (C), and 18 U.S.C. § 1203 (a). We reject the four arguments raised on appeal, and affirm appellants' convictions. I. Facts 3 In September 1990, four young friends, Daniel Arellano-Rosas, Isaac Sanchez-Hernandez, Mario…